AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDIvsBMW X1 (F48) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (F48)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,226 km762 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score86/100
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions123 g/km
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,500kg3,307lb |
| Gross weight | 2,415kg5,324lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.1s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 78.3s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.0s Calculated | 35.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,226km762mi Calculated | 1,085km674mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,439mm175in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,821mm72in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,598mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,561mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 183mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 123g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.0 s | 35.9 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 7.6 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI and BMW X1 (F48) 20d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 1,226 km 762 mi |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,085 km 674 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | BMWX1 (F48)20d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,226 km 762 mi | 1,085 km 674 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 123 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI | BMW X1 (F48) 20d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 141 km (88 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Is 245 kg lighter
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























