Car comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDIvsBMW X1 (F48) 20d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY)

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2016-2018
VS

BMW X1 (F48)

20d

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    223 km/h
    139 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    1,226 km
    762 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

BMW X1 (F48) 20d

  • Lightest
    1,500 kg
    3,307 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    127 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    123 g/km
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIBMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,745kg3,847lb
1,500kg3,307lb
Gross weight
2,415kg5,324lb
2,070kg4,564lb
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
85.1s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
78.3s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
37.0s
Calculated
35.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,226km762mi
Calculated
1,085km674mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,663mm184in
4,439mm175in
Width
1,893mm75in
1,821mm72in
Height
1,659mm65in
1,598mm63in
Wheelbase
2,819mm111in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,616mm64in
1,561mm61in
Rear track
1,609mm63in
1,562mm61in
Ground clearance-
183mm7in
Trunk volume
550L
505L
Max trunk volume-
1,550L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
51L
CO2 emissions
139g/km
123g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDIBMW X1 (F48) 20dPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI3,800-4,200 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm
BMWX1 (F48)20d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIBMWX1 (F48)20d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.0 s
35.9 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
BMWX1 (F48)20d
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
BMWX1 (F48)20d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
BMWX1 (F48)20d
1,500 kg
3,307 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
223 km/h
139 mph
BMWX1 (F48)20d
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI7.6 s
BMWX1 (F48)20d7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI and BMW X1 (F48) 20d: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
BMWX1 (F48)20d
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
BMWX1 (F48)20d
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
1,226 km
762 mi
BMWX1 (F48)20d
1,085 km
674 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
223 km/h
139 mph
BMWX1 (F48)20d
190 hp
142 kW
7.8 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
7.6 s
BMWX1 (F48)20d
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
BMWX1 (F48)20d
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIBMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
7.8 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
1,500 kg
3,307 lb
Fuel consumption
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Range score
1,226 km
762 mi
1,085 km
674 mi
CO2 score
139 g/km
123 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDIBMW X1 (F48) 20d
Consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.28 LC100 km8.23 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.93 LC100 mi13.24 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used795 L210 US gal175 UK gal705 L186 US gal155 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,391 LC/year1,234 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI

  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 141 km (88 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

BMW X1 (F48) 20d

  • Is 245 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 16 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI vs BMW X1 (F48) 20d - car comparison - FastVsFaster