BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 20d · Stage 3vsBMW X1 (F48) 20d · Stage 2vsBMW X1 (F48) 20d · Stage 1vsBMW X1 (F48) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (F48)
20d (Stage 2)
BMW X1 (F48)
20d (Stage 1)
BMW X1 (F48)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 20d (Stage 3) 295 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed262 km/h163 mph
- Most powerful295 hp220 kW
- Highest torque640 Nm472 lb-ft
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Best power-to-weight196 hp/t146 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions123 g/km
- Best estimated range1,085 km674 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295hp220kW+105 hp | 257hp191kW+67 hp | 228hp170kW+38 hp | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft+240 Nm | 560Nm413lb-ft+160 Nm | 500Nm369lb-ft+100 Nm | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,500kg3,307lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | 252 km/h 157 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.5s99% target: 259 km/h / 161 mph-11.9 s Calculated | 72.1s99% target: 249 km/h / 155 mph-6.3 s Calculated | 76.3s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph-2.2 s Calculated | 78.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s-1.9 s | 6.5s-1.3 s | 7.0s-0.8 s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.2s-16.8 s Calculated | 22.4s-13.6 s Calculated | 25.8s-10.2 s Calculated | 36.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s-1.7 s Calculated | 6.2s-1.2 s Calculated | 6.6s-0.8 s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s-1.7 s Calculated | 14.5s-1.2 s Calculated | 14.9s-0.7 s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 427Nm/t285lb-ft/ton Calculated | 373Nm/t250lb-ft/ton Calculated | 333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated | 267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,085km674mi Calculated | 1,085km674mi Calculated | 1,085km674mi Calculated | 1,085km674mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,439mm175in | 4,439mm175in | 4,439mm175in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,821mm72in | 1,821mm72in | 1,821mm72in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,598mm63in | 1,598mm63in | 1,598mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,561mm61in | 1,561mm61in | 1,561mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,562mm61in | 1,562mm61in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | 183mm7in | 183mm7in | 183mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 505L | 505L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,550L | 1,550L | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 51L | 51L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 123g/km | 123g/km | 123g/km | 123g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 20d (Stage 3) 295 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (F48) 20d (Stage 2) 257 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (F48) 20d (Stage 1) 228 hp: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (F48) 20d 190 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | 6.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.5 s | 7.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.2 s | 22.4 s | 25.8 s | 36.0 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | 252 km/h 157 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.6 s | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.2 s | 12.6 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.5 s | 14.9 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 257 hp 191 kW |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 228 hp 170 kW |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X1 (F48) 20d (Stage 3) 295 hp has 105 hp more than BMW X1 (F48) 20d 190 hp.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d 190 hp and BMW X1 (F48) 20d (Stage 3) 295 hp: 105 hp (78 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 252 km/h 157 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 5.9 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 6.5 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 7.0 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d (Stage 3) 295 hp and BMW X1 (F48) 20d 190 hp: 1.9 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are BMW X1 (F48) 20d (Stage 2) 257 hp and BMW X1 (F48) 20d (Stage 1) 228 hp, separated by only 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 1,085 km 674 mi |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 1,085 km 674 mi |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 1,085 km 674 mi |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp | 1,085 km 674 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW | 5.9 s | 262 km/h 163 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 257 hp 191 kW | 6.5 s | 252 km/h 157 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 228 hp 170 kW | 7.0 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 20d (Stage 3) 295 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 3)295 hp | BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 2)257 hp | BMWX1 (F48)20d (Stage 1)228 hp | BMWX1 (F48)20d190 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295 hp 220 kW | 257 hp 191 kW | 228 hp 170 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.5 s | 7.0 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 262 km/h 163 mph | 252 km/h 157 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,085 km 674 mi | 1,085 km 674 mi | 1,085 km 674 mi | 1,085 km 674 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 123 g/km | 123 g/km | 123 g/km | 123 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 20d (Stage 3) 295 hp | BMW X1 (F48) 20d (Stage 2) 257 hp | BMW X1 (F48) 20d (Stage 1) 228 hp | BMW X1 (F48) 20d 190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 20d (Stage 3) 295 hp
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X1 (F48) 20d (Stage 2) 257 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























