Car comparison

BMW X1 (F48) 20dvsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X1 (F48)

20d

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2016-2018
VS

Volkswagen T-Roc I

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X1 (F48) 20d

  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,085 km
    674 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX1 (F48)20dVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,500kg3,307lb
1,420kg3,131lb
Gross weight
2,070kg4,564lb
1,990kg4,387lb
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
78.3s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
67.5s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
35.9s
Calculated
35.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,085km674mi
Calculated
809km503mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,439mm175in
4,234mm167in
Width
1,821mm72in
1,819mm72in
Height
1,598mm63in
1,573mm62in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,590mm102in
Front track
1,561mm61in
1,546mm61in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,541mm61in
Ground clearance
183mm7in
-
Trunk volume
505L
445L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
1,290L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
55L
CO2 emissions
123g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X1 (F48) 20dVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX1 (F48)20d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,180 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX1 (F48)20dVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.9 s
35.7 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
92 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
190 hp
142 kW
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
1,500 kg
3,307 lb
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
1,420 kg
3,131 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
222 km/h
138 mph
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
216 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d7.8 s
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI7.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and BMW X1 (F48) 20d: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)20d
1,085 km
674 mi
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
809 km
503 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX1 (F48)20d
190 hp
142 kW
7.8 s
222 km/h
138 mph
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
216 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX1 (F48)20d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX1 (F48)20d
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
7.8 s
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX1 (F48)20d
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX1 (F48)20dVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,500 kg
3,307 lb
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
Fuel consumption
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,234 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Range score
1,085 km
674 mi
809 km
503 mi
CO2 score
123 g/km
-
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X1 (F48) 20dVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
Consumption4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.23 LC100 km11.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.24 LC100 mi19.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used705 L186 US gal155 UK gal1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,234 LC/year1,785 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 20d

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 276 km (172 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 60 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI

  • Is 80 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 20d vs Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster