BMW X1 (F48)
Car comparison
BMW X1 (F48) 20dvsVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan II
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed219 km/h136 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,550 kg3,417 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions133 g/km
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score93/100
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Best estimated range1,053 km654 mi
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX1 (F48)20d | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Gross weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.5s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.8s Calculated | 45.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 1,053km654mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,439mm175in | 4,486mm177in |
| Width | 1,821mm72in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,598mm63in | 1,673mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,677mm105in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 183mm7in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 615L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,655L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 133g/km | 149g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX1 (F48)20d | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.8 s | 45.9 s |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 7.6 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,053 km 654 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX1 (F48)20d | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 1,053 km 654 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 133 g/km | 149 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X1 (F48) 20d | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Is 300 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Has 53 km (33 mi) more estimated range
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























