BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsBMW X1 (F48) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X1 (F48)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score84/100
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20i | BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,460kg3,219lb | 1,550kg3,417lb |
| Gross weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 2,145kg4,729lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.6s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 75.5s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.8s Calculated | 36.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 864km537mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,439mm175in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,821mm72in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,598mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,561mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,562mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 183mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | 1,550L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 133g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
- BMW X1 (F48) 20d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20i | BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.8 s | 36.8 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 2 hp more than BMW X1 (F48) 20d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 7.7 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 7.6 s |
Although BMW X2 (F39) 20i has more power, BMW X1 (F48) 20d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 20d and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 864 km 537 mi |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.7 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX1 (F48)20d |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X1 (F48) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX1 (F48)20d | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20i | BMWX1 (F48)20d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 864 km 537 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 133 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20i | BMW X1 (F48) 20d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW X1 (F48) 20d
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 136 km (84 mi) more estimated range
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























