Car comparison

BMW X6 (F16) 40dvsBMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012 28i

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X6 (F16)

40d

313 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2018
VS

BMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012

28i

245 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2012-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X6 (F16) 40d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    313 hp
    233 kW
  • Highest torque
    630 Nm
    465 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    149 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    165 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,349 km
    838 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX6 (F16)40dBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
Power
313hp233kW
245hp183kW
Torque
630Nm465lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
2,105kg4,641lb
1,655kg3,649lb
Gross weight
2,820kg6,217lb
2,130kg4,696lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
To 99% top speed
74.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
66.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
6.1s
0-200 km/h
24.2s
Calculated
23.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
5.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton
Calculated
211Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,349km838mi
Calculated
808km502mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,909mm193in
4,477mm176in
Width
1,989mm78in
1,798mm71in
Height
1,702mm67in
1,545mm61in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
2,760mm109in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,500mm59in
Rear track
1,706mm67in
1,529mm60in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
-
Trunk volume
550L
420L
Max trunk volume
1,525L
1,350L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
63L
CO2 emissions
165g/km
182g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X6 (F16) 40dBMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28iPowerTorque
  • BMW X6 (F16) 40d: Power / Torque
  • BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX6 (F16)40d4,400 rpm1,500-2,500 rpm4,650 rpm
BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i5,000-6,500 rpm1,250-4,800 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX6 (F16)40dBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
5.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
6.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.2 s
23.3 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
313 hp
233 kW
BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
245 hp
183 kW

BMW X6 (F16) 40d has 68 hp more than BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i and BMW X6 (F16) 40d: 68 hp (51 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
630 Nm
465 lb-ft
BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
1,655 kg
3,649 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
240 km/h
149 mph
BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
240 km/h
149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d5.8 s
BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i6.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and BMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
1,349 km
838 mi
BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
808 km
502 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX6 (F16)40d
313 hp
233 kW
5.8 s
240 km/h
149 mph
BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
245 hp
183 kW
6.1 s
240 km/h
149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX6 (F16)40d
Power
313 hp
233 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,477 mm
176.3 in
Height
1,545 mm
60.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX6 (F16)40d
Power
313 hp
233 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

BMW X6 (F16) 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX6 (F16)40d
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
5.8 s
BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
6.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX6 (F16)40d
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
BMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX6 (F16)40dBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
Power
313 hp
233 kW
245 hp
183 kW
Torque
630 Nm
465 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
6.1 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
240 km/h
149 mph
Lightness
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
1,655 kg
3,649 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,477 mm
176.3 in
Height
1,545 mm
60.8 in
Range score
1,349 km
838 mi
808 km
502 mi
CO2 score
165 g/km
182 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
420 L
14.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X6 (F16) 40dBMW X1 (E84 LCI) Facelift 2012 28i
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X6 (F16) 40d

  • Has 68 hp more
  • Has 280 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 542 km (336 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 130 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 17 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X6 (F16) 40d
BMW X1 (E84 LCI) 28i
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW X6 (F16) 40d vs BMW X1 (E84 LCI) · Facelift 2012 28i - car comparison - FastVsFaster