BMW X6 (F16)
Car comparison
BMW X6 (F16) 40dvsBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010 40d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 (E70 LCI) · Facelift 2010
40d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 (F16) 40d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful313 hp233 kW
- Highest torque630 Nm465 lb-ft
- Lightest2,105 kg4,641 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions165 g/km
- Best estimated range1,349 km838 mi
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score90/100
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 (F16)40d | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313hp233kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,105kg4,641lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Gross weight | 2,820kg6,217lb | 2,790kg6,151lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 87.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.2s Calculated | 29.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,349km838mi Calculated | 1,133km704mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,909mm193in | 4,857mm191in |
| Width | 1,989mm78in | 1,933mm76in |
| Height | 1,702mm67in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,706mm67in | 1,650mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 222mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,525L | 1,750L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 165g/km | 198g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 (F16) 40d: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 4,400 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 (F16)40d | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.2 s | 29.4 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 313 hp 233 kW |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 306 hp 228 kW |
BMW X6 (F16) 40d has 7 hp more than BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d and BMW X6 (F16) 40d: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 5.8 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 1,349 km 838 mi |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 1,133 km 704 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.8 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.6 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)40d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)40d |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 (F16) 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 (F16)40d | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 (F16)40d | BMWX5 (E70 LCI)Facelift 201040d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp 233 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,349 km 838 mi | 1,133 km 704 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 165 g/km | 198 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 (F16) 40d | BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 (F16) 40d
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 216 km (134 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 33 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW X5 (E70 LCI) Facelift 2010 40d
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























