BMW M5 (E34)
Car comparison
BMW M5 (E34) 3.8vsMercedes-Benz W124 · Facelift 1989 500 E V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz W124 · Facelift 1989
500 E V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M5 (E34) 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest1,650 kg3,638 lb
- Best power-to-weight206 hp/t154 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Mercedes-Benz W124 Facelift 1989 500 E V8
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption17.5 L/100 km13.4 mpg US16.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk520 L
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | Mercedes-BenzW124Facelift 1989500 E V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 326hp243kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 62.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.7s Calculated | 18.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 206hp/t154kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 938km583mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,795cc232cu in | 4,973cc303cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | 4,750mm187in |
| Width | 1,751mm69in | 1,796mm71in |
| Height | 1,392mm55in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,761mm109in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,474mm58in | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,496mm59in | 1,529mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 520L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M5 (E34) 3.8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz W124 Facelift 1989 500 E V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 6,900 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,150 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzW124Facelift 1989500 E V8 | 5,700 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | Mercedes-BenzW124Facelift 1989500 E V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.7 s | 18.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzW124Facelift 1989500 E V8 | 326 hp 243 kW |
BMW M5 (E34) 3.8 has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz W124 Facelift 1989 500 E V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz W124 Facelift 1989 500 E V8 and BMW M5 (E34) 3.8: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzW124Facelift 1989500 E V8 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzW124Facelift 1989500 E V8 | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzW124Facelift 1989500 E V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 5.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzW124Facelift 1989500 E V8 | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M5 (E34) 3.8 and Mercedes-Benz W124 Facelift 1989 500 E V8: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzW124Facelift 1989500 E V8 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzW124Facelift 1989500 E V8 | 326 hp 243 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzW124Facelift 1989500 E V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | Mercedes-BenzW124Facelift 1989500 E V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 326 hp 243 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 938 km 583 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M5 (E34) 3.8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M5 (E34) 3.8
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz W124 Facelift 1989 500 E V8
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























