BMW M5 (F90)
Car comparison
BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8vsBMW M5 (E34) 3.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M5 (E34)
3.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful600 hp447 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight323 hp/t241 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best practicality score77/100
BMW M5 (E34) 3.5
- Lightest1,670 kg3,682 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range957 km595 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | BMWM5 (E34)3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600hp447kW | 315hp235kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,855kg4,090lb | 1,670kg3,682lb |
| Gross weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 40.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 64.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s | 19.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.2s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | 18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 323hp/t241kW/t147hp/1000 lb Calculated | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 404Nm/t271lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 648km402mi Calculated | 957km595mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 3,535cc216cu in |
| Length | 4,966mm196in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,751mm69in |
| Height | 1,473mm58in | 1,392mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,982mm117in | 2,761mm109in |
| Front track | 1,626mm64in | 1,473mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,495mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 132mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 460L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 241g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M5 (E34) 3.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 5,600-6,700 rpm | 1,800-5,600 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.5 | 6,900 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | BMWM5 (E34)3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.2 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 19.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 201 km/h 125 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.5 | 315 hp 235 kW |
BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8 has 285 hp more than BMW M5 (E34) 3.5.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M5 (E34) 3.5 and BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8: 285 hp (213 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.5 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.5 | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.5 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 3.4 s |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.5 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8 and BMW M5 (E34) 3.5: 2.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.5 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M5 (E34) 3.5 and BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.5 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 648 km 402 mi |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.5 | 957 km 595 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.5 | 315 hp 235 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM5 (E34)3.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM5 (E34)3.5 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.5 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.5 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | BMWM5 (E34)3.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp 447 kW | 315 hp 235 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 648 km 402 mi | 957 km 595 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 241 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8 | BMW M5 (E34) 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8
- Has 285 hp more
- Has 390 Nm more
- Is 2.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 135 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW M5 (E34) 3.5
- Is 185 kg lighter
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 310 km (193 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























