BMW M4 (F82)
Car comparison
BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0vsBMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M4 (G82)
Competition 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight331 hp/t247 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range706 km439 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score84/100
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Best overall score75/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 2,155kg4,751lb |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.6s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 50.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.2s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 331hp/t247kW/t150hp/1000 lb Calculated | 296hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 397Nm/t266lb-ft/ton Calculated | 377Nm/t252lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 706km439mi Calculated | 578km359mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,794mm189in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,887mm74in |
| Height | 1,383mm54in | 1,393mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,857mm112in |
| Front track | 1,596mm63in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 108mm4in | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 440L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 59L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 4,000-5,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,750-5,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.2 s | 13.3 s |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 11.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 204 km/h 126 mph | 191 km/h 119 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 510 hp 380 kW |
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 has 10 hp more than BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 3.8 s |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 3.9 s |
Although BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 has more power, BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 331 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 296 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 706 km 439 mi |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 578 km 359 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 500 hp 373 kW | 3.8 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 331 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 296 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 706 km 439 mi | 578 km 359 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 331 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 296 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 | BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0
- Is 215 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 127 km (79 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























