Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8vsBMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190)

S 4.0 V8

510 hp3982 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2015-2017
VS

BMW M4 (F82)

GTS 3.0

500 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2016-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0

  • Lightest
    1,510 kg
    3,329 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    331 hp/t
    247 kW/t
    3.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    199 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    706 km
    439 mi
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    44/100

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    320 km/h
    199 mph Unrestricted
    310 km/h
    193 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    510 hp
    380 kW
  • Highest torque
    650 Nm
    479 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
Power
510hp380kW
500hp373kW
Torque
650Nm479lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
1,645kg3,627lb
1,510kg3,329lb
Gross weight
1,890kg4,167lb
1,900kg4,189lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Calculated
305 km/h
190 mph
To 99% top speed
58.4s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph
Calculated
56.0s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
3.8s
0-200 km/h
10.8s
Calculated
11.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
3.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.5s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
310hp/t231kW/t141hp/1000 lb
Calculated
331hp/t247kW/t150hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton
Calculated
397Nm/t266lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
677km421mi
Calculated
706km439mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
2,979cc182cu in
Length
4,546mm179in
4,689mm185in
Width
1,939mm76in
1,870mm74in
Height
1,288mm51in
1,383mm54in
Wheelbase
2,630mm104in
2,812mm111in
Front track
1,680mm66in
1,596mm63in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,604mm63in
Ground clearance
98mm4in
108mm4in
Trunk volume-
445L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
65L
60L
CO2 emissions
224g/km
199g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V86,250 rpm1,750-4,750 rpm6,500 rpm
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.06,250 rpm4,000-5,500 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
3.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
3.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.8 s
11.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Likely limited
305 km/h
190 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
7.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.8 s
9.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.5 s
11.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
207 km/h
128 mph
203 km/h
126 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
500 hp
373 kW

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 has 10 hp more than BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
1,645 kg
3,627 lb
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
1,510 kg
3,329 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
305 km/h
190 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V83.8 s
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.03.8 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
310 hp/t
231 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
331 hp/t
247 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
677 km
421 mi
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
706 km
439 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
3.8 s
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
500 hp
373 kW
3.8 s
305 km/h
190 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,546 mm
179.0 in
Height
1,288 mm
50.7 in
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,689 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
Power
500 hp
373 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
3.8 s
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
3.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
310 hp/t
231 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
331 hp/t
247 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0
Power
510 hp
380 kW
500 hp
373 kW
Torque
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
3.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
Lightness
1,645 kg
3,627 lb
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
Fuel consumption
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,546 mm
179.0 in
Height
1,288 mm
50.7 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,689 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in
Range score
677 km
421 mi
706 km
439 mi
CO2 score
224 g/km
199 g/km
Trunk score
-
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
310 hp/t
231 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
331 hp/t
247 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0
Consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.80 LC100 km14.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.04 LC100 mi23.94 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,520 LC/year2,231 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0

  • Is 135 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 29 km (18 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 25 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8
BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

S 4.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8
GTS 3.0
CSL 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
S 4.0 V8
55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8
GTS 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
S 4.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)S 4.0 V8
GTS 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
S 4.0 V8
AMG C 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 S V8
GTS 3.0
M850i
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMW8 Series (G15)M850i
S 4.0 V8
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
GTS 3.0
CS 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
S 4.0 V8
AMG GLC 63 S
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63 S
GTS 3.0
M850i V8
VS
BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0vsBMW8 Series Gran Coupe (G16)M850i V8
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 vs BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster