Maserati GranTurismo I · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Maserati GranTurismo I · Facelift 2017 Sport 4.7 V8vsBMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M4 (F82)
CS 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Best power-to-weight291 hp/t217 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions197 g/km
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Maserati GranTurismo I Facelift 2017 Sport 4.7 V8
- Fastest top speed299 km/h186 mph
- Most powerful460 hp343 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 | BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460hp343kW | 460hp343kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 299 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 296 km/h / 184 mph Calculated | 59.1s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.8s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 258hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated | 291hp/t217kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 601km374mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,691cc286cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,910mm193in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,915mm75in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,353mm53in | 1,392mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,942mm116in | 2,812mm111in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 445L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 86L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 331g/km | 197g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati GranTurismo I Facelift 2017 Sport 4.7 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 4,000-5,380 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 | BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.8 s | 12.4 s |
| Top speed | 299 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 115 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 | 460 hp 343 kW |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 460 hp 343 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 | 299 km/h 186 mph |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 | 4.8 s |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 and Maserati GranTurismo I Facelift 2017 Sport 4.7 V8: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 and Maserati GranTurismo I Facelift 2017 Sport 4.7 V8: 5.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 | 601 km 374 mi |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 | 460 hp 343 kW | 4.8 s | 299 km/h 186 mph |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 460 hp 343 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 |
| 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017Sport 4.7 V8 | BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp 343 kW | 460 hp 343 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 299 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,780 kg 3,924 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 601 km 374 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 331 g/km | 197 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati GranTurismo I Facelift 2017 Sport 4.7 V8 | BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.03 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,754 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati GranTurismo I Facelift 2017 Sport 4.7 V8
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 5.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 113 km (70 mi) more estimated range
- Has 185 L more trunk volume
- Emits 134 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























