Lotus Evora GT430
Car comparison
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24VvsBMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M4 (F82)
CS 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
- Most powerful460 hp343 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions197 g/km
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph
- Lightest1,299 kg2,864 lb
- Best power-to-weight336 hp/t250 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 436hp325kW | 460hp343kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,299kg2,864lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.6s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 59.1s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.9s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 336hp/t250kW/t152hp/1000 lb Calculated | 291hp/t217kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated | 380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 594km369mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,396mm173in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,845mm73in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,229mm48in | 1,392mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,575mm101in | 2,812mm111in |
| Front track | - | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 160L | 445L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 234g/km | 197g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V: Power / Torque
- BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 4,000-5,380 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.9 s | 12.4 s |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 206 km/h 128 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 436 hp 325 kW |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 460 hp 343 kW |
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 has 24 hp more than Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V and BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 1,299 kg 2,864 lb |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 3.8 s |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 3.9 s |
Although BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 has more power, Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V and BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 and Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 336 hp/t 250 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 594 km 369 mi |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 436 hp 325 kW | 3.8 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 460 hp 343 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 336 hp/t 250 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 436 hp 325 kW | 460 hp 343 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,299 kg 2,864 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 594 km 369 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 234 g/km | 197 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 336 hp/t 250 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V | BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V
- Is 281 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
- Has 24 hp more
- Has 160 Nm more
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 120 km (75 mi) more estimated range
- Has 285 L more trunk volume
- Emits 37 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























