Car comparison

BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0vsJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW M4 (F82)

CS 3.0

460 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2017-2018
VS

Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020

5.0 V8

450 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2019-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    290 km/h
    180 mph Unrestricted
    280 km/h
    174 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    460 hp
    343 kW
  • Highest torque
    600 Nm
    443 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,580 kg
    3,483 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    291 hp/t
    217 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    197 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    714 km
    444 mi
  • Largest trunk
    445 L
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    84/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
Power
460hp343kW
450hp336kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
580Nm428lb-ft
Curb weight
1,580kg3,483lb
1,660kg3,660lb
Gross weight
2,040kg4,497lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Calculated
285 km/h
177 mph
To 99% top speed
58.7s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
63.2s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.9s
4.6s
0-200 km/h
12.4s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.7s
Calculated
4.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.8s
Calculated
12.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
291hp/t217kW/t132hp/1000 lb
Calculated
271hp/t202kW/t123hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton
Calculated
349Nm/t234lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
714km444mi
Calculated
660km410mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,979cc182cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,672mm184in
4,470mm176in
Width
1,870mm74in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,392mm55in
1,311mm52in
Wheelbase
2,812mm111in
2,622mm103in
Front track
1,579mm62in
1,584mm62in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,628mm64in
Ground clearance
121mm5in
-
Trunk volume
445L
299L
Max trunk volume-
509L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
60L
70L
CO2 emissions
197g/km
244g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.06,250 rpm4,000-5,380 rpm6,500 rpm
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V86,000 rpm2,500-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.7 s
4.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.9 s
4.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.4 s
14.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Likely limited
285 km/h
177 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.8 s
8.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.0 s
10.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.8 s
12.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
196 km/h
122 mph
187 km/h
116 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
460 hp
343 kW
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
450 hp
336 kW

BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 and BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
580 Nm
428 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
1,660 kg
3,660 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
285 km/h
177 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.03.9 s
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V84.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 and Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
271 hp/t
202 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
714 km
444 mi
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
660 km
410 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
460 hp
343 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
450 hp
336 kW
4.6 s
285 km/h
177 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Power
460 hp
343 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,392 mm
54.8 in
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
285 km/h
177 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
299 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,470 mm
176.0 in
Height
1,311 mm
51.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Power
460 hp
343 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
285 km/h
177 mph
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
3.9 s
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
4.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
271 hp/t
202 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
Power
460 hp
343 kW
450 hp
336 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
580 Nm
428 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.9 s
4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
285 km/h
177 mph
Lightness
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,392 mm
54.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
299 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,470 mm
176.0 in
Height
1,311 mm
51.6 in
Range score
714 km
444 mi
660 km
410 mi
CO2 score
197 g/km
244 g/km
Trunk score
445 L
15.7 cu ft
299 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
271 hp/t
202 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km18.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi29.85 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year2,783 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 80 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 54 km (33 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 146 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 47 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
Jaguar F-type Coupe 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

CS 3.0
3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMWM4 (G82)3.0
5.0 V8
3.0 V6
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6
CS 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
5.0 V8
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8vsJaguarF-type CoupeS 3.0 V6
CS 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8
CS 3.0
CS 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
5.0 V8
3.0 V6
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20173.0 V6
CS 3.0
M850i
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMW8 Series (G15)M850i
5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8vsJaguarF-type Convertible5.0 V8
CS 3.0
M850i V8
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMW8 Series Gran Coupe (G16)M850i V8
5.0 V8
6.2 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8vsChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 vs Jaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster