Car comparison

Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8vsBMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Camaro VI

6.2 V8

453 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2016-2018
VS

BMW M4 (F82)

CS 3.0

460 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.9 s
  • Most powerful
    460 hp
    343 kW
  • Lightest
    1,580 kg
    3,483 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    291 hp/t
    217 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    197 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    714 km
    444 mi
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    84/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Power
453hp338kW
460hp343kW
Torque
617Nm455lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
1,659kg3,657lb
1,580kg3,483lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
2,040kg4,497lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
69.6s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph
Calculated
58.7s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.4s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
13.7s
Calculated
12.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.2s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.4s
Calculated
11.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
291hp/t217kW/t132hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton
Calculated
380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
649km403mi
Calculated
714km444mi
Calculated
Displacement
6,162cc376cu in
2,979cc182cu in
Length
4,784mm188in
4,672mm184in
Width
1,880mm74in
1,870mm74in
Height
1,340mm53in
1,392mm55in
Wheelbase
2,812mm111in
2,812mm111in
Front track
1,610mm63in
1,579mm62in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,604mm63in
Ground clearance-
121mm5in
Trunk volume-
445L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
72L
60L
CO2 emissions
252g/km
197g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0PowerTorque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
  • BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V85,700 rpm4,600 rpm5,950 rpm
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.06,250 rpm4,000-5,380 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.2 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.4 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.7 s
12.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
7.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
10.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.4 s
11.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
190 km/h
118 mph
196 km/h
122 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
453 hp
338 kW
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
460 hp
343 kW

BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 has 7 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 and BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
617 Nm
455 lb-ft
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
1,659 kg
3,657 lb
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
1,580 kg
3,483 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V84.4 s
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.03.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: 2.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
649 km
403 mi
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
714 km
444 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
453 hp
338 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
460 hp
343 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Power
453 hp
338 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Power
460 hp
343 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,392 mm
54.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Power
453 hp
338 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Power
460 hp
343 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
4.4 s
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
3.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Power
453 hp
338 kW
460 hp
343 kW
Torque
617 Nm
455 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.4 s
3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Lightness
1,659 kg
3,657 lb
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
Fuel consumption
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,392 mm
54.8 in
Range score
649 km
403 mi
714 km
444 mi
CO2 score
252 g/km
197 g/km
Trunk score
-
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
Consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.43 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.26 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,914 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8

  • Has 17 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Is 79 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 66 km (41 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 55 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.2 V8
6.2 V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
CS 3.0
3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMWM4 (G82)3.0
6.2 V8
6.2 V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8
CS 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
6.2 V8
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
CS 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
6.2 V8
Grand sport 6.2 V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCorvette Coupe (C7)Grand sport 6.2 V8
CS 3.0
CS 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0
6.2 V8
Stingray 6.2 V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCorvette Convertible (C8)Stingray 6.2 V8
CS 3.0
M850i
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMW8 Series (G15)M850i
6.2 V8
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
CS 3.0
M850i V8
VS
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0vsBMW8 Series Gran Coupe (G16)M850i V8
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 vs BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster