Car comparison

BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0vsBMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW M4 (G82)

CSL 3.0

550 hp2993 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2022-2022
VS

BMW M4 (F82)

CS 3.0

460 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    307 km/h
    191 mph
  • Most powerful
    550 hp
    410 kW
  • Highest torque
    650 Nm
    479 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    338 hp/t
    252 kW/t
    3.0 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best performance score
    89/100

BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0

  • Lightest
    1,580 kg
    3,483 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    714 km
    444 mi
  • Largest trunk
    445 L
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Power
550hp410kW
460hp343kW
Torque
650Nm479lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
1,625kg3,583lb
1,580kg3,483lb
Gross weight
1,970kg4,343lb
2,040kg4,497lb
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
52.6s99% target: 304 km/h / 189 mph
Calculated
58.7s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.7s
3.9s
0-200 km/h
10.7s
12.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.5s
Calculated
3.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.4s
Calculated
11.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
338hp/t252kW/t154hp/1000 lb
Calculated
291hp/t217kW/t132hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
400Nm/t268lb-ft/ton
Calculated
380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
584km363mi
Calculated
714km444mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
2,979cc182cu in
Length
4,794mm189in
4,672mm184in
Width
1,921mm76in
1,870mm74in
Height
1,386mm55in
1,392mm55in
Wheelbase
2,857mm112in
2,812mm111in
Front track
1,623mm64in
1,579mm62in
Rear track
1,609mm63in
1,604mm63in
Ground clearance
113mm4in
121mm5in
Trunk volume
440L
445L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
59L
60L
CO2 emissions-
197g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0PowerTorque
  • BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0: Power / Torque
  • BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.06,250 rpm2,750-5,950 rpm6,500 rpm
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.06,250 rpm4,000-5,380 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.5 s
3.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.7 s
3.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.7 s
12.4 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
5.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
7.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.7 s
10.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.4 s
11.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
207 km/h
129 mph
196 km/h
122 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
550 hp
410 kW
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
460 hp
343 kW

BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 has 90 hp more than BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0: 90 hp (67 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
1,580 kg
3,483 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
307 km/h
191 mph
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.03.7 s
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.03.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 and BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
338 hp/t
252 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
584 km
363 mi
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
714 km
444 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
550 hp
410 kW
3.7 s
307 km/h
191 mph
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
460 hp
343 kW
3.9 s
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,794 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,386 mm
54.6 in
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Power
460 hp
343 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,392 mm
54.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Power
460 hp
343 kW
0-100 km/h3.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
3.7 s
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
3.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0
338 hp/t
252 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0
Power
550 hp
410 kW
460 hp
343 kW
Torque
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.7 s
3.9 s
Top speed
307 km/h
191 mph
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
280 km/h174 mph
Lightness
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
1,580 kg
3,483 lb
Fuel consumption
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
440 L
15.5 cu ft
Length
4,794 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,386 mm
54.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,392 mm
54.8 in
Range score
584 km
363 mi
714 km
444 mi
CO2 score
-
197 g/km
Trunk score
440 L
15.5 cu ft
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
338 hp/t
252 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
291 hp/t
217 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
Consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.68 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.45 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,651 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0

  • Has 90 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0

  • Is 45 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 130 km (81 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 vs BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster