BMW M4 (G82)
Car comparison
BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0vsBMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M4 (F82)
CS 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed307 km/h191 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight338 hp/t252 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score89/100
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 460hp343kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,625kg3,583lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 307 km/h 191 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.6s99% target: 304 km/h / 189 mph Calculated | 58.7s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.7s | 12.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.4s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 338hp/t252kW/t154hp/1000 lb Calculated | 291hp/t217kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 400Nm/t268lb-ft/ton Calculated | 380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 584km363mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,794mm189in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,921mm76in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,386mm55in | 1,392mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 2,812mm111in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 113mm4in | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 445L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 197g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,750-5,950 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 4,000-5,380 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.7 s | 12.4 s |
| Top speed | 307 km/h 191 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.4 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 207 km/h 129 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 460 hp 343 kW |
BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 has 90 hp more than BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0: 90 hp (67 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 307 km/h 191 mph |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 3.7 s |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 and BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 584 km 363 mi |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 550 hp 410 kW | 3.7 s | 307 km/h 191 mph |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 460 hp 343 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 (G82)CSL 3.0 | BMWM4 (F82)CS 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 460 hp 343 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 307 km/h 191 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 584 km 363 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 197 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 291 hp/t 217 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0 | BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 (G82) CSL 3.0
- Has 90 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW M4 (F82) CS 3.0
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 130 km (81 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























