BMW M4 Convertible (F83)
Car comparison
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0vsChevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 6.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018
6.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,765 kg3,891 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions213 g/km
- Best estimated range659 km410 mi
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score82/100
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8
- Most powerful455 hp339 kW
- Highest torque617 Nm455 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight257 hp/t192 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 455hp339kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 617Nm455lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 1,769kg3,900lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 62.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.0s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 257hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated | 349Nm/t233lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 659km410mi Calculated | 626km389mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 6,162cc376cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 4,784mm188in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,897mm75in |
| Height | 1,392mm55in | 1,348mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,812mm111in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,610mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 119mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 220L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 370L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 213g/km | 260g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 7,000 rpm | 1,850-5,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 5,700 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.0 s | 16.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 113 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 455 hp 339 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 has 5 hp more than BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 1,769 kg 3,900 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 4.5 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 4.6 s |
Although Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 has more power, BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 659 km 410 mi |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 626 km 389 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 455 hp 339 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0 | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 455 hp 339 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | 1,769 kg 3,900 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 659 km 410 mi | 626 km 389 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 213 g/km | 260 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0 | Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0
- Is 4 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 33 km (21 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 47 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 67 Nm more
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























