Car comparison

BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0vsChevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 6.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW M4 Convertible (F83)

Competition 3.0

450 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCabriolet / convertible2016-2020
VS

Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018

6.2 V8

455 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2018-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    203 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    690 km
    429 mi
  • Best performance score
    78/100
  • Best economy score
    83/100

Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8

  • Most powerful
    455 hp
    339 kW
  • Highest torque
    617 Nm
    455 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,769 kg
    3,900 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    257 hp/t
    192 kW/t
    3.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
Power
450hp336kW
455hp339kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
617Nm455lb-ft
Curb weight
1,790kg3,946lb
1,769kg3,900lb
Gross weight
2,250kg4,960lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
57.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
62.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.3s
4.6s
0-200 km/h
15.4s
Calculated
16.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.1s
Calculated
4.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.4s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
251hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb
Calculated
257hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
307Nm/t206lb-ft/ton
Calculated
349Nm/t233lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
690km429mi
Calculated
626km389mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,979cc182cu in
6,162cc376cu in
Length
4,671mm184in
4,784mm188in
Width
1,870mm74in
1,897mm75in
Height
1,392mm55in
1,348mm53in
Wheelbase
2,812mm111in
2,812mm111in
Front track
1,579mm62in
1,610mm63in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,604mm63in
Ground clearance
119mm5in
-
Trunk volume
220L
-
Max trunk volume
370L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
60L
72L
CO2 emissions
203g/km
260g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8PowerTorque
  • BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.07,000 rpm1,850-5,500 rpm7,250 rpm
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V85,700 rpm4,600 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.1 s
4.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.3 s
4.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.4 s
16.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
8.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
10.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.4 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
183 km/h
114 mph
179 km/h
111 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
450 hp
336 kW
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
455 hp
339 kW

Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 has 5 hp more than BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
617 Nm
455 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
1,790 kg
3,946 lb
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
1,769 kg
3,900 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 has more power, BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: 2.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
257 hp/t
192 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
690 km
429 mi
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
626 km
389 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
450 hp
336 kW
4.3 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
455 hp
339 kW
4.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,671 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,392 mm
54.8 in
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
Power
455 hp
339 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,348 mm
53.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
Power
455 hp
339 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
4.3 s
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
4.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
257 hp/t
192 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWM4 Convertible (F83)Competition 3.0ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
Power
450 hp
336 kW
455 hp
339 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
617 Nm
455 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.3 s
4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,790 kg
3,946 lb
1,769 kg
3,900 lb
Fuel consumption
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,671 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,392 mm
54.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,348 mm
53.1 in
Range score
690 km
429 mi
626 km
389 mi
CO2 score
203 g/km
260 g/km
Trunk score
220 L
7.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
257 hp/t
192 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8
Consumption8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.22 LC100 km20.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.50 LC100 mi32.39 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,284 LC/year3,019 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0

  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 64 km (39 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 57 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 67 Nm more
  • Is 21 kg lighter
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW M4 Convertible (F83) Competition 3.0 vs Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster