BMW M4 Convertible (F83)
Car comparison
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0vsMorgan Plus 8 4.8 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMorgan Plus 8
4.8 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful431 hp321 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions213 g/km
- Best estimated range659 km410 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score76/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Lightest1,220 kg2,690 lb
- Best power-to-weight301 hp/t224 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | MorganPlus 84.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 431hp321kW | 367hp274kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 490Nm361lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,220kg2,690lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 45.2s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.4s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 246hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated | 301hp/t224kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 314Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 402Nm/t269lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 659km410mi Calculated | 500km311mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 4,799cc293cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 4,010mm158in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,751mm69in |
| Height | 1,386mm55in | 1,220mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | - |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,603mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 220L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 370L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 213g/km | 256g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0: Power / Torque
- Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 5,500-7,300 rpm | 1,850-5,500 rpm | 7,550 rpm |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 6,300 rpm | - | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | MorganPlus 84.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.4 s | 15.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 has 64 hp more than Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8 and BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0: 64 hp (48 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 4.6 s |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 4.5 s |
Although BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 has more power, Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8 and BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 and Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 659 km 410 mi |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 500 km 311 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 4.5 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0 | MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 431 hp 321 kW | 367 hp 274 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 659 km 410 mi | 500 km 311 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 213 g/km | 256 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 246 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0 | Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 Convertible (F83) 3.0
- Has 64 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 159 km (99 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 43 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8
- Is 530 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 55 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























