AUDI TT RS Roadster (8S)
Car comparison
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8S) 2.5 TFSIvsMorgan Plus 8 4.8 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMorgan Plus 8
4.8 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8S) 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions194 g/km
- Best estimated range647 km402 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score76/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score34/100
Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8
- Highest torque490 Nm361 lb-ft
- Lightest1,220 kg2,690 lb
- Best power-to-weight301 hp/t224 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI | MorganPlus 84.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 367hp274kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 490Nm361lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,220kg2,690lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 49.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 45.2s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.6s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 261hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated | 301hp/t224kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 314Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 402Nm/t269lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 647km402mi Calculated | 500km311mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 4,799cc293cu in |
| Length | 4,191mm165in | 4,010mm158in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,751mm69in |
| Height | 1,346mm53in | 1,220mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,505mm99in | - |
| Front track | 1,564mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,543mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 280L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 194g/km | 256g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT RS Roadster (8S) 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI | 5,850-7,000 rpm | 1,700-5,850 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 6,300 rpm | - | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI | MorganPlus 84.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.6 s | 15.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.0 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI | 400 hp 298 kW |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8S) 2.5 TFSI has 33 hp more than Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8 and AUDI TT RS Roadster (8S) 2.5 TFSI: 33 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI | 3.9 s |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 4.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT RS Roadster (8S) 2.5 TFSI and Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT RS Roadster (8S) 2.5 TFSI and Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI | 261 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI | 647 km 402 mi |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 500 km 311 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI | 400 hp 298 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 4.5 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8S) 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI | 261 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT RS Roadster (8S)2.5 TFSI | MorganPlus 84.8 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 367 hp 274 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 647 km 402 mi | 500 km 311 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 194 g/km | 256 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 261 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT RS Roadster (8S) 2.5 TFSI | Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8S) 2.5 TFSI
- Has 33 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 147 km (91 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 62 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Morgan Plus 8 4.8 V8
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 310 kg lighter
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























