BMW M3 (G80)
Car comparison
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0vsBMW M5 (F90 LCI) · Facelift 2020 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M5 (F90 LCI) · Facelift 2020
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted302 km/h188 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,765 kg3,891 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score79/100
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 4.4 V8
- Most powerful600 hp447 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight317 hp/t236 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Best estimated range642 km399 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 600hp447kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 1,895kg4,178lb |
| Gross weight | 2,245kg4,949lb | 2,440kg5,379lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 40.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s | 11.1s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.2s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 312hp/t232kW/t141hp/1000 lb Calculated | 317hp/t236kW/t144hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 368Nm/t246lb-ft/ton Calculated | 396Nm/t265lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 567km353mi Calculated | 642km399mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,795mm189in | 4,983mm196in |
| Width | 1,918mm76in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,473mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 2,982mm117in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 123mm5in | 133mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 530L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 242g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,750-5,950 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.2 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 11.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 9.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 125 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW |
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 4.4 V8 has 50 hp more than BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 and BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 4.4 V8: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph |
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 3.4 s |
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 3.4 s |
Although BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 4.4 V8 has more power, BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 317 hp/t 236 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 567 km 353 mi |
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 642 km 399 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 550 hp 410 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph |
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | 317 hp/t 236 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 20204.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 600 hp 447 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 567 km 353 mi | 642 km 399 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 242 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 317 hp/t 236 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 | BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 4.4 V8
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 74 km (46 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























