BMW M3 (G80)
Car comparison
BMW M3 (G80) 3.0vsBMW X4 M (F98) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X4 M (F98)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 (G80) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful480 hp358 kW
- Lightest1,705 kg3,759 lb
- Best power-to-weight282 hp/t210 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score81/100
BMW X4 M (F98) 3.0
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range619 km385 mi
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480hp358kW | 480hp358kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,705kg3,759lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | 2,500kg5,512lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 39.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 62.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.3s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 282hp/t210kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 323Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 305Nm/t204lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 546km339mi Calculated | 619km385mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,794mm189in | 4,758mm187in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,927mm76in |
| Height | 1,433mm56in | 1,618mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 2,864mm113in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,623mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,632mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,430L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 239g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 (G80) 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW X4 M (F98) 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,650-6,130 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,600-5,600 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.3 s | 15.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 198 km/h 123 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 1,970 kg 4,343 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 4.2 s |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 4.2 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 282 hp/t 210 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 546 km 339 mi |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 619 km 385 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X4 M (F98) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | 282 hp/t 210 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 (G80)3.0 | BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp 358 kW | 480 hp 358 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | 1,970 kg 4,343 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 546 km 339 mi | 619 km 385 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 239 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 282 hp/t 210 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 (G80) 3.0 | BMW X4 M (F98) 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 (G80) 3.0
- Is 265 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW X4 M (F98) 3.0
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 73 km (45 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























