BMW X3 M (F97)
Car comparison
BMW X3 M (F97) 3.0vsBMW X4 M (F98) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X4 M (F98)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X3 M (F97) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful480 hp358 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lightest1,970 kg4,343 lb
- Best power-to-weight244 hp/t182 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions239 g/km
- Best estimated range619 km385 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score77/100
BMW X4 M (F98) 3.0
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 | BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480hp358kW | 480hp358kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 2,500kg5,512lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 62.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.9s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 305Nm/t204lb-ft/ton Calculated | 305Nm/t204lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 619km385mi Calculated | 619km385mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,726mm186in | 4,758mm187in |
| Width | 1,897mm75in | 1,927mm76in |
| Height | 1,667mm66in | 1,618mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,864mm113in | 2,864mm113in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,623mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,602mm63in | 1,632mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 525L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 1,430L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 239g/km | 239g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X3 M (F97) 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW X4 M (F98) 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,600-5,600 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,600-5,600 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 | BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.9 s | 15.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 113 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 | 1,970 kg 4,343 lb |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 1,970 kg 4,343 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 | 4.2 s |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 4.2 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 | 619 km 385 mi |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 619 km 385 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X3 M (F97) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX3 M (F97)3.0 | BMWX4 M (F98)3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp 358 kW | 480 hp 358 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,970 kg 4,343 lb | 1,970 kg 4,343 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 619 km 385 mi | 619 km 385 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 239 g/km | 239 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X3 M (F97) 3.0 | BMW X4 M (F98) 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X3 M (F97) 3.0
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X4 M (F98) 3.0
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























