BMW M3 (G80)
Car comparison
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0vsBMW M3 (F80) Competition 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 (F80)
Competition 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted302 km/h188 mph Restricted
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight312 hp/t232 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best practicality score74/100
BMW M3 (F80) Competition 3.0
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range723 km449 mi
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | 2,245kg4,949lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 37.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s | 11.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.2s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 312hp/t232kW/t141hp/1000 lb Calculated | 288hp/t215kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 368Nm/t246lb-ft/ton Calculated | 353Nm/t236lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 567km353mi Calculated | 723km449mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,795mm189in | 4,671mm184in |
| Width | 1,918mm76in | 1,877mm74in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,431mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 2,812mm111in |
| Front track | 1,623mm64in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 123mm5in | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 194g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 (F80) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,750-5,950 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 | 7,000 rpm | 1,850-5,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.2 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 11.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 125 mph | 202 km/h 125 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW |
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 has 100 hp more than BMW M3 (F80) Competition 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 (F80) Competition 3.0 and BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0: 100 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
| BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph |
| BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 3.4 s |
| BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 | 4.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 and BMW M3 (F80) Competition 3.0: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 (F80) Competition 3.0 and BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 | 288 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 567 km 353 mi |
| BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 | 723 km 449 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 550 hp 410 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph |
| BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 | 288 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | BMWM3 (F80)Competition 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 567 km 353 mi | 723 km 449 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 194 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 288 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 | BMW M3 (F80) Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0
- Has 100 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW M3 (F80) Competition 3.0
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 156 km (97 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























