BMW M3 (F80)
Car comparison
BMW M3 (F80) 3.0vsBMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 (E90)
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 (F80) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful431 hp321 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Best power-to-weight284 hp/t211 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range682 km424 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 (F80)3.0 | BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 431hp321kW | 420hp313kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,520kg3,351lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 39.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 59.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s Calculated | 16.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 284hp/t211kW/t129hp/1000 lb Calculated | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 362Nm/t242lb-ft/ton Calculated | 249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | 508km316mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 3,999cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 4,580mm180in |
| Width | 1,877mm74in | 1,817mm72in |
| Height | 1,424mm56in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,761mm109in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,603mm63in | 1,539mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 450L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 204g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 (F80) 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)3.0 | 5,500-7,300 rpm | 1,850-5,500 rpm | 7,550 rpm |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 (F80)3.0 | BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 16.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 123 mph | 181 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
BMW M3 (F80) 3.0 has 11 hp more than BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8 and BMW M3 (F80) 3.0: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)3.0 | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)3.0 | 4.3 s |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 (F80) 3.0 and BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)3.0 | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 (F80) 3.0 and BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8: 3.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)3.0 | 284 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)3.0 | 682 km 424 mi |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 508 km 316 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)3.0 | 431 hp 321 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)3.0 |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 (F80) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)3.0 | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (F80)3.0 | 284 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 (F80)3.0 | BMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 431 hp 321 kW | 420 hp 313 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | 508 km 316 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 204 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 284 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 (F80) 3.0 | BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 (F80) 3.0
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 174 km (108 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
BMW M3 (E90) 4.0 V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























