BMW M3 Coupe (E92)
Car comparison
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8vsRolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRolls-Royce Phantom Coupe
6.75 i V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight263 hp/t196 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.0 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best economy score75/100
Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12
- Most powerful460 hp343 kW
- Highest torque720 Nm531 lb-ft
- Best estimated range637 km396 mi
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score75/100
- Best practicality score58/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW | 460hp343kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 720Nm531lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 2,590kg5,710lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 3,050kg6,724lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 104.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s | 23.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 263hp/t196kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated | 178hp/t132kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 529km329mi Calculated | 637km396mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,999cc244cu in | 6,749cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,615mm182in | 5,609mm221in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,418mm56in | 1,592mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,761mm109in | 3,320mm131in |
| Front track | 1,540mm61in | 1,685mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,539mm61in | 1,670mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 395L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 5,350 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,600 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 23.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 186 km/h 115 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 460 hp 343 kW |
Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12 has 40 hp more than BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 and Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 2,590 kg 5,710 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 5.8 s |
Although Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12 has more power, BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 and Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 and Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12: 3.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 178 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 529 km 329 mi |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 637 km 396 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 460 hp 343 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 |
| 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | 178 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | Rolls-RoycePhantom Coupe6.75 i V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 460 hp 343 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 2,590 kg 5,710 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 529 km 329 mi | 637 km 396 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 395 L 13.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 178 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 | Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK | 15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km | 27.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi | 44.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal | 2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year | 4,121 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
- Is 990 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 85 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Rolls-Royce Phantom Coupe 6.75 i V12
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 320 Nm more
- Has 108 km (67 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























