BMW M3 Coupe (E36)
Car comparison
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0ivsFerrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari Mondial
3.4 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk405 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque323 Nm238 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight199 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Best estimated range807 km501 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 323Nm238lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,460kg3,219lb | 1,505kg3,318lb |
| Gross weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,825kg4,023lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 81.3s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 23.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 21.4L/100 km11mpg US13.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 199hp/t149kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 807km501mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,990cc182cu in | 3,405cc208cu in |
| Length | 4,433mm175in | 4,535mm179in |
| Width | 1,710mm67in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,335mm53in | 1,235mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,422mm56in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,444mm57in | 1,560mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 110mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 405L | 300L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 96L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0i: Power / Torque
- Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 7,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 7,200 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 23.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 286 hp 213 kW |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW |
Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V has 14 hp more than BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0i and Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 6.0 s |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 6.3 s |
Although Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V has more power, BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0i and Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0i and Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 714 km 444 mi |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 807 km 501 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i | FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 807 km 501 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 405 L 14.3 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0i | Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 Coupe (E36) 3.0i
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 105 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 3 Nm more
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 92 km (57 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























