Car comparison

Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32VvsBMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Maserati Spyder

4.2 i V8 32V

390 hp4244 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2001-2007
VS

BMW M3 Convertible (E93)

4.0 V8

420 hp3999 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2008-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    283 km/h
    176 mph
  • Highest torque
    451 Nm
    333 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,720 kg
    3,792 lb
  • Best estimated range
    553 km
    344 mi
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    74/100

BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8

  • Most powerful
    420 hp
    313 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    230 hp/t
    171 kW/t
    4.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.3 L/100 km
    19.1 mpg US
    23.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.3 L/100 km
    13.6 mpg US
    16.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.4 L/100 km
    25.0 mpg US
    30.1 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    74/100
  • Best practicality score
    42/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VBMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
Power
390hp291kW
420hp313kW
Torque
451Nm333lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,720kg3,792lb
1,830kg4,034lb
Gross weight
1,980kg4,365lb
2,280kg5,027lb
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.5s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph
Calculated
61.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.0s
5.1s
0-200 km/h
16.2s
Calculated
17.3s
0-60 mph
4.8s
Calculated
4.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK
17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb
Calculated
230hp/t171kW/t104hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton
Calculated
219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
553km344mi
Calculated
512km318mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,244cc259cu in
3,999cc244cu in
Length
4,303mm169in
4,615mm182in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,804mm71in
Height
1,305mm51in
1,392mm55in
Wheelbase
2,440mm96in
2,761mm109in
Front track
1,525mm60in
1,540mm61in
Rear track
1,538mm61in
1,539mm61in
Trunk volume
300L
210L
Max trunk volume-
350L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
88L
63L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32VBMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
  • BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V7,000 rpm4,500 rpm7,250 rpm
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V88,300 rpm3,900 rpm8,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VBMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.8 s
4.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.0 s
5.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.2 s
17.3 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.6 s
8.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.0 s
11.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
13.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
180 km/h
112 mph
177 km/h
110 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
390 hp
291 kW
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
420 hp
313 kW

BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8 has 30 hp more than Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V.

The biggest power difference is between Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V and BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
451 Nm
333 lb-ft
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
1,830 kg
4,034 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
283 km/h
176 mph
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V5.0 s
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V85.1 s

Although BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8 has more power, Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V and BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
15.9 L/100 km
14.8 mpg US
17.8 mpg UK
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8 and Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V: 3.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
230 hp/t
171 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
553 km
344 mi
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
512 km
318 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
390 hp
291 kW
5.0 s
283 km/h
176 mph
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
420 hp
313 kW
5.1 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
Power
390 hp
291 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,303 mm
169.4 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
Power
420 hp
313 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
210 L
7.4 cu ft
Length
4,615 mm
181.7 in
Height
1,392 mm
54.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
Power
390 hp
291 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
15.9 L/100 km
14.8 mpg US
17.8 mpg UK
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
Power
420 hp
313 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
15.9 L/100 km
14.8 mpg US
17.8 mpg UK
5.0 s
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
5.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
15.9 L/100 km
14.8 mpg US
17.8 mpg UK
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
230 hp/t
171 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VBMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
Power
390 hp
291 kW
420 hp
313 kW
Torque
451 Nm
333 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.0 s
5.1 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
1,830 kg
4,034 lb
Fuel consumption
15.9 L/100 km
14.8 mpg US
17.8 mpg UK
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,303 mm
169.4 in
Height
1,305 mm
51.4 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
210 L
7.4 cu ft
Length
4,615 mm
181.7 in
Height
1,392 mm
54.8 in
Range score
553 km
344 mi
512 km
318 mi
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
210 L
7.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
230 hp/t
171 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMaserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32VBMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8
Consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km27.83 LC100 km21.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi44.78 LC100 mi34.64 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,385 L630 US gal525 UK gal1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,174 LC/year3,229 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V

  • Has 51 Nm more
  • Is 110 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 41 km (26 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 90 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V
BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.2 i V8 32V
4.7
VS
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VvsMaseratiGranCabrio I4.7
4.0 V8
3.2i 24V
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8vsBMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V
4.2 i V8 32V
AMG CLK 55 V8
VS
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VvsMercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8vsBMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8
4.2 i V8 32V
4.3 i V8 32V
VS
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VvsAston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8vsBMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8
4.2 i V8 32V
4.9
VS
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VvsBMWZ8 (E52)4.9
4.0 V8
3.2
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8vsBMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
4.2 i V8 32V
360 Spider
VS
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VvsFerrari360 Modena Spider360 Spider
4.0 V8
CSL 3.2i 24V
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8vsBMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V
4.2 i V8 32V
5.9 V12
VS
MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32VvsAston MartinDB7 Volante5.9 V12
4.0 V8
3.0
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8vsBMWM3 (F80)3.0
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V vs BMW M3 Convertible (E93) 4.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster