BMW M2 (G87)
Car comparison
BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0vsBMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M4 (F82)
GTS 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted302 km/h188 mph Restricted
- Most powerful530 hp395 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best practicality score51/100
BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight331 hp/t247 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range706 km439 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best economy score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530hp395kW | 500hp373kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 2,125kg4,685lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph Calculated | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.1s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 55.6s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.7s | 11.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 312hp/t232kW/t141hp/1000 lb Calculated | 331hp/t247kW/t150hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 382Nm/t256lb-ft/ton Calculated | 397Nm/t266lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 520km323mi Calculated | 706km439mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,587mm181in | 4,689mm185in |
| Width | 1,887mm74in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,395mm55in | 1,383mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,747mm108in | 2,812mm111in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,596mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 119mm5in | 108mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 445L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 199g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,750-5,730 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 4,000-5,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.7 s | 11.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph Limited | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 200 km/h 124 mph | 204 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 530 hp 395 kW |
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 500 hp 373 kW |
BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0 has 30 hp more than BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 and BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph |
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 3.8 s |
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 3.8 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 and BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 331 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 520 km 323 mi |
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 706 km 439 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 530 hp 395 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph |
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 500 hp 373 kW | 3.8 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | 331 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM2 (G87)CS 3.0 | BMWM4 (F82)GTS 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp 395 kW | 500 hp 373 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 520 km 323 mi | 706 km 439 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 199 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 331 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0 | BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M2 (G87) CS 3.0
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW M4 (F82) GTS 3.0
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 186 km (116 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























