Porsche 911 (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4S 3.0vsBMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M2 coupe (F87)
CS 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4S 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Fastest top speed306 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Lightest1,565 kg3,450 lb
- Best power-to-weight288 hp/t214 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions206 g/km
- Best estimated range744 km463 mi
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score83/100
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 530Nm391lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,565kg3,450lb | 1,575kg3,472lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 83.1s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 62.1s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.7s | 12.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 288hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated | 349Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 744km463mi Calculated | 542km337mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,981cc182cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,519mm178in | 4,461mm176in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,414mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,693mm106in |
| Front track | 1,589mm63in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,557mm61in | 1,601mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 118mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 132L | 390L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 206g/km | 219g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4S 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 2,300-5,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,350-5,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.4 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.7 s | 12.9 s |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 3.6 s |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 4.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4S 3.0 and BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4S 3.0 and BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 288 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 744 km 463 mi |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 542 km 337 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW | 3.6 s | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4S 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | 288 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (992)Carrera 4S 3.0 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 744 km 463 mi | 542 km 337 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 206 g/km | 219 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 288 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4S 3.0 | BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 4S 3.0
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 203 km (126 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 13 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 258 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























