Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 6.2 V8vsBMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M2 coupe (F87)
CS 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Lightest1,575 kg3,472 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions219 g/km
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Most powerful455 hp339 kW
- Highest torque617 Nm455 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range649 km403 mi
- Best performance score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 455hp339kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 617Nm455lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,659kg3,657lb | 1,575kg3,472lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.8s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 62.1s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.7s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 274hp/t205kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 349Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 542km337mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,162cc376cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 4,461mm176in |
| Width | 1,897mm75in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,340mm53in | 1,414mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,811mm111in | 2,693mm106in |
| Front track | 1,610mm63in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,601mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 118mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 258L | 390L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 252g/km | 219g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 5,700 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,350-5,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.7 s | 12.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 455 hp 339 kW |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 has 5 hp more than BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 4.4 s |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 4.0 s |
Although Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 has more power, BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 649 km 403 mi |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 542 km 337 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 455 hp 339 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 455 hp 339 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 542 km 337 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 252 g/km | 219 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 258 L 9.1 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 | BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 67 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 107 km (66 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0
- Is 84 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 132 L more trunk volume
- Emits 33 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























