BMW M2 coupe (F87)
Car comparison
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0vsBMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M4 (G82)
Competition 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight287 hp/t214 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range584 km363 mi
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best practicality score53/100
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,575 kg3,472 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,205kg4,861lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.1s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 46.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 3.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 287hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 349Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated | 366Nm/t245lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 542km337mi Calculated | 584km363mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,461mm176in | 4,794mm189in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,887mm74in |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,394mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,693mm106in | 2,857mm112in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,617mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,601mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 118mm5in | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 440L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 59L |
| CO2 emissions | 219g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,350-5,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,750-5,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 3.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 12.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 510 hp 380 kW |
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 has 60 hp more than BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 4.0 s |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 3.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 and BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 and BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 542 km 337 mi |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 584 km 363 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | BMWM4 (G82)Competition 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 3.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 542 km 337 mi | 584 km 363 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 219 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 | BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW M4 (G82) Competition 3.0
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 42 km (26 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























