Porsche 718 Cayman (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0vsBMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M2 coupe (F87)
Competition 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Most powerful410 hp306 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0
- Fastest top speed293 km/h182 mph
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Best power-to-weight285 hp/t212 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range593 km368 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 410hp306kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,575kg3,472lb |
| Gross weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | 293 km/h 182 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.7s99% target: 290 km/h / 180 mph Calculated | 66.8s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.1s | 13.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 285hp/t212kW/t129hp/1000 lb Calculated | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 349Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 593km368mi Calculated | 565km351mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,995cc244cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,405mm173in | 4,461mm176in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,276mm50in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,693mm106in |
| Front track | 1,527mm60in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,535mm60in | 1,601mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 118mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 270L | 390L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 210g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0: Power / Torque
- BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 7,000 rpm | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 7,800 rpm |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 5,250-7,000 rpm | 2,350-5,200 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.1 s | 13.7 s |
| Top speed | 293 km/h 182 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 188 km/h 117 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 400 hp 298 kW |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 410 hp 306 kW |
BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 has 10 hp more than Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 and BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 4.5 s |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 285 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 593 km 368 mi |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 565 km 351 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.5 s | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 410 hp 306 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | 285 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GTS 4.0 | BMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 410 hp 306 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 293 km/h 182 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 593 km 368 mi | 565 km 351 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 210 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 285 hp/t 212 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0 | BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GTS 4.0
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 27 km (17 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW M2 coupe (F87) Competition 3.0
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























