Car comparison

BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0vsBMW M4 (F82) 3.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW M2 coupe (F87)

3.0

370 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2015-2018
VS

BMW M4 (F82)

3.0

431 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2014-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0

  • Most powerful
    431 hp
    321 kW
  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,497 kg
    3,300 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    288 hp/t
    215 kW/t
    3.5 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    682 km
    424 mi
  • Largest trunk
    445 L
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    79/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.5 L/100 km
    22.4 mpg US
    26.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    185 g/km
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Power
370hp276kW
431hp321kW
Torque
465Nm343lb-ft
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
1,520kg3,351lb
1,497kg3,300lb
Gross weight
2,010kg4,431lb
2,040kg4,497lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
59.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
54.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.3s
4.3s
0-200 km/h
15.1s
Calculated
14.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.1s
Calculated
4.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.4s
Calculated
12.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
243hp/t182kW/t110hp/1000 lb
Calculated
288hp/t215kW/t131hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton
Calculated
367Nm/t246lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
658km409mi
Calculated
682km424mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,979cc182cu in
2,979cc182cu in
Length
4,468mm176in
4,671mm184in
Width
1,854mm73in
1,870mm74in
Height
1,410mm56in
1,383mm54in
Wheelbase
2,693mm106in
2,812mm111in
Front track
1,579mm62in
1,579mm62in
Rear track
1,601mm63in
1,603mm63in
Ground clearance
123mm5in
121mm5in
Trunk volume
390L
445L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
52L
60L
CO2 emissions
185g/km
204g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0BMW M4 (F82) 3.0PowerTorque
  • BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0: Power / Torque
  • BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.06,500 rpm1,400-5,560 rpm6,750 rpm
BMWM4 (F82)3.05,500-7,300 rpm1,850-5,500 rpm7,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.1 s
4.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.3 s
4.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.1 s
14.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
8.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
10.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.4 s
12.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
184 km/h
114 mph
186 km/h
116 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0
370 hp
276 kW
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
431 hp
321 kW

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 has 61 hp more than BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 and BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: 61 hp (45 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0
465 Nm
343 lb-ft
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
550 Nm
406 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0
1,520 kg
3,351 lb
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
1,497 kg
3,300 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.04.3 s
BMWM4 (F82)3.04.3 s

Although BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 has more power, BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 and BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0
243 hp/t
182 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
288 hp/t
215 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0
658 km
409 mi
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
682 km
424 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0
370 hp
276 kW
4.3 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
431 hp
321 kW
4.3 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0
Power
370 hp
276 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,468 mm
175.9 in
Height
1,410 mm
55.5 in
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Power
431 hp
321 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,671 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0
Power
370 hp
276 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Power
431 hp
321 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
4.3 s
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
4.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0
243 hp/t
182 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
288 hp/t
215 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Power
370 hp
276 kW
431 hp
321 kW
Torque
465 Nm
343 lb-ft
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.3 s
4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,520 kg
3,351 lb
1,497 kg
3,300 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.8 L/100 km
26.7 mpg US
32.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
390 L
13.8 cu ft
Length
4,468 mm
175.9 in
Height
1,410 mm
55.5 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,671 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in
Range score
658 km
409 mi
682 km
424 mi
CO2 score
185 g/km
204 g/km
Trunk score
390 L
13.8 cu ft
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
243 hp/t
182 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
288 hp/t
215 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km15.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi24.78 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year2,310 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0

  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Emits 19 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0

  • Has 61 hp more
  • Has 85 Nm more
  • Is 23 kg lighter
  • Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 24 km (15 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 55 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0
3.0
VS
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0vsBMWM2 (G87)3.0
3.0
3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMWM4 (G82)3.0
3.0
M240i
VS
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0vsBMW2 Series Coupe (F22)M240i
3.0
3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0
3.0
440i
VS
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0vsBMW4 Series Coupe (F32)440i
3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
3.0
3.0
VS
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0vsBMWM4 (F82)3.0
3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0
3.0
440i
VS
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0vsBMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)440i
3.0
650i
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i
3.0
440i
VS
BMWM2 coupe (F87)3.0vsBMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017440i
3.0
650i
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i
BMW M2 coupe (F87) 3.0 vs BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster