BMW M2 coupe (F87)
Car comparison
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0vsBMW i4 (G26) M50 83.9 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW i4 (G26)
M50 83.9 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW i4 (G26) M50 83.9 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Most powerful544 hp406 kW
- Highest torque795 Nm586 lb-ft
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score83/100
- Best practicality score69/100
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,575 kg3,472 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | BMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 544hp406kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 795Nm586lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 2,215kg4,883lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,735kg6,030lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.6s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 44.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 246hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 349Nm/t234lb-ft/ton Calculated | 359Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 542km337mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | - |
| Length | 4,461mm176in | 4,783mm188in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,448mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,693mm106in | 2,856mm112in |
| Front track | 1,579mm62in | 1,589mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,601mm63in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 118mm5in | 125mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,290L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 219g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | BMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 15.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| BMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW |
BMW i4 (G26) M50 83.9 kWh has 94 hp more than BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 and BMW i4 (G26) M50 83.9 kWh: 94 hp (70 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| BMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh | 795 Nm 586 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| BMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh | 2,215 kg 4,883 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 4.0 s |
| BMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW i4 (G26) M50 83.9 kWh and BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| BMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| BMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh | 544 hp 406 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM2 coupe (F87)CS 3.0 | BMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 544 hp 406 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 795 Nm 586 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 2,215 kg 4,883 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 542 km 337 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 219 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M2 coupe (F87) CS 3.0
- Is 640 kg lighter
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW i4 (G26) M50 83.9 kWh
- Has 94 hp more
- Has 245 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























