Porsche 911 Coupe (F)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 SvsBMW E9 3.0CSi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW E9
3.0CSi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,075 kg2,370 lb
- Best power-to-weight177 hp/t132 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score79/100
BMW E9 3.0CSi
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque277 Nm204 lb-ft
- Best estimated range661 km410 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | BMWE93.0CSi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 209Nm154lb-ft | 277Nm204lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,075kg2,370lb | 1,420kg3,131lb |
| Gross weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 93.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.9s Calculated | 41.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 177hp/t132kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 608km378mi Calculated | 661km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,341cc143cu in | 2,985cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,147mm163in | 4,660mm183in |
| Width | 1,610mm63in | 1,670mm66in |
| Height | 1,320mm52in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,271mm89in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,372mm54in | 1,446mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,354mm53in | 1,402mm55in |
| Ground clearance | 150mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 200L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S: Power / Torque
- BMW E9 3.0CSi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 6,500 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 7,300 rpm |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 5,500 rpm | 4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | BMWE93.0CSi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.9 s | 41.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 190 hp 142 kW |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 200 hp 149 kW |
BMW E9 3.0CSi has 10 hp more than Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S and BMW E9 3.0CSi: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 209 Nm 154 lb-ft |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 277 Nm 204 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 7.0 s |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 7.7 s |
Although BMW E9 3.0CSi has more power, Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S and BMW E9 3.0CSi: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S and BMW E9 3.0CSi: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 608 km 378 mi |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 661 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWE93.0CSi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWE93.0CSi |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 Coupe (F)2.3 S | BMWE93.0CSi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 209 Nm 154 lb-ft | 277 Nm 204 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,075 kg 2,370 lb | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 608 km 378 mi | 661 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S | BMW E9 3.0CSi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 Coupe (F) 2.3 S
- Is 345 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW E9 3.0CSi
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 68 Nm more
- Has 53 km (33 mi) more estimated range
- Has 250 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























