BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)
Car comparison
BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 220vsBMW E9 3.0CSi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW E9
3.0CSi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 220
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range754 km468 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score63/100
BMW E9 3.0CSi
- Lightest1,420 kg3,131 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk450 L
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 | BMWE93.0CSi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 277Nm204lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,420kg3,131lb |
| Gross weight | 2,005kg4,420lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 93.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.2s Calculated | 41.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 754km468mi Calculated | 661km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 2,985cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,546mm179in | 4,660mm183in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,670mm66in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | 1,446mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,402mm55in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 450L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 49L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 220: Power / Torque
- BMW E9 3.0CSi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,450-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 5,500 rpm | 4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 | BMWE93.0CSi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.2 s | 41.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 200 hp 149 kW |
BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 220 has 4 hp more than BMW E9 3.0CSi.
The biggest power difference is between BMW E9 3.0CSi and BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 220: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 277 Nm 204 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 | 7.3 s |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 220 and BMW E9 3.0CSi: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 220 and BMW E9 3.0CSi: 4.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 | 754 km 468 mi |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 661 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWE93.0CSi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWE93.0CSi |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 220 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| BMWE93.0CSi | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW2 Series Gran Coupe (F74)220 | BMWE93.0CSi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 277 Nm 204 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 754 km 468 mi | 661 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 220 | BMW E9 3.0CSi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (F74) 220
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 23 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 93 km (58 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW E9 3.0CSi
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























