Car comparison

BMW 7 Series (G11) 730dvsCadillac ATS Sedan 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW 7 Series (G11)

730d

265 hp2993 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2019
VS

Cadillac ATS Sedan

2.0

276 hp1998 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedSedan2013-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW 7 Series (G11) 730d

  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    620 Nm
    457 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    129 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,592 km
    989 mi
  • Largest trunk
    515 L
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    68/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.0 s
  • Most powerful
    276 hp
    206 kW
  • Lightest
    1,484 kg
    3,272 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    186 hp/t
    139 kW/t
    5.4 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMW7 Series (G11)730dCadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
265hp198kW
276hp206kW
Torque
620Nm457lb-ft
353Nm260lb-ft
Curb weight
1,755kg3,869lb
1,484kg3,272lb
Gross weight
2,450kg5,401lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
62.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
58.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s
6.0s
0-200 km/h
18.6s
Calculated
19.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.8s
Calculated
5.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
151hp/t113kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
353Nm/t236lb-ft/ton
Calculated
238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,592km989mi
Calculated
727km452mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
5,098mm201in
4,644mm183in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,805mm71in
Height
1,478mm58in
1,427mm56in
Wheelbase
3,070mm121in
2,775mm109in
Front track
1,618mm64in
1,512mm60in
Rear track
1,646mm65in
1,548mm61in
Ground clearance
135mm5in
-
Trunk volume
515L
381L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
78L
63L
CO2 emissions
129g/km
199g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW 7 Series (G11) 730dCadillac ATS Sedan 2.0PowerTorque
  • BMW 7 Series (G11) 730d: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMW7 Series (G11)730d4,000 rpm2,000-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
CadillacATS Sedan2.05,500 rpm1,700-5,500 rpm7,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMW7 Series (G11)730dCadillacATS Sedan2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.8 s
5.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
6.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.6 s
19.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
11.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
174 km/h
108 mph
173 km/h
108 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW7 Series (G11)730d
265 hp
198 kW
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
276 hp
206 kW

Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 has 11 hp more than BMW 7 Series (G11) 730d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW 7 Series (G11) 730d and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW7 Series (G11)730d
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
353 Nm
260 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW7 Series (G11)730d
1,755 kg
3,869 lb
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
1,484 kg
3,272 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW7 Series (G11)730d
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW7 Series (G11)730d6.1 s
CadillacATS Sedan2.06.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 and BMW 7 Series (G11) 730d: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW7 Series (G11)730d
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 7 Series (G11) 730d and Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0: 3.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW7 Series (G11)730d
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMW7 Series (G11)730d
1,592 km
989 mi
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
727 km
452 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMW7 Series (G11)730d
265 hp
198 kW
6.1 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
276 hp
206 kW
6.0 s
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMW7 Series (G11)730d
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
515 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
5,098 mm
200.7 in
Height
1,478 mm
58.2 in
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Length
4,644 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,427 mm
56.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMW7 Series (G11)730d
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
276 hp
206 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

BMW 7 Series (G11) 730d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMW7 Series (G11)730d
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
6.1 s
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
6.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMW7 Series (G11)730d
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
CadillacATS Sedan2.0
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMW7 Series (G11)730dCadillacATS Sedan2.0
Power
265 hp
198 kW
276 hp
206 kW
Torque
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
6.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,755 kg
3,869 lb
1,484 kg
3,272 lb
Fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
515 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
5,098 mm
200.7 in
Height
1,478 mm
58.2 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Length
4,644 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,427 mm
56.2 in
Range score
1,592 km
989 mi
727 km
452 mi
CO2 score
129 g/km
199 g/km
Trunk score
515 L
18.2 cu ft
381 L
13.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
186 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW 7 Series (G11) 730dCadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km15.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi24.22 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year2,258 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW 7 Series (G11) 730d

  • Has 267 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 865 km (538 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 134 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 70 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Is 271 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW 7 Series (G11) 730d
Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

730d
730d
VS
BMW7 Series (G11)730dvsBMW7 Series (G11 LCI)Facelift 2019730d
2.0
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
730d
735i
VS
BMW7 Series (G11)730dvsBMW7 Series (G70)735i
2.0
2.0
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacCTS III2.0
730d
750d
VS
BMW7 Series (G11)730dvsBMW7 Series (F01 LCI)Facelift 2012750d
2.0
28T
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacXTS28T
730d
740i
VS
BMW7 Series (G11)730dvsBMW7 Series (E38)740i
2.0
28T
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsCadillacXTSFacelift 201728T
730d
740i
VS
BMW7 Series (G11)730dvsBMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998740i
2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TSI
730d
740i
VS
BMW7 Series (G11)730dvsBMW7 Series (E32)Facelift 1992740i
2.0
Veloce 2.0
VS
CadillacATS Sedan2.0vsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Veloce 2.0
BMW 7 Series (G11) 730d vs Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster