BMW 7 Series (E65) · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
BMW 7 Series (E65) · Facelift 2005 745dvsHolden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHolden Commodore (VT)
5.7 i V8 SS
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best power-to-weight207 hp/t155 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 330hp246kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 2,620kg5,776lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 57.9s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.8s Calculated | 24.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 368Nm/t246lb-ft/ton Calculated | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 978km608mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,423cc270cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 5,039mm198in | 4,884mm192in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,491mm59in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,990mm118in | 2,788mm110in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,596mm63in | 1,587mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 475L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d: Power / Torque
- Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 3,800 rpm | 1,900-2,500 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 5,600 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.8 s | 24.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 330 hp 246 kW |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 340 hp 254 kW |
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS has 10 hp more than BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 6.6 s |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 6.9 s |
Although Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS has more power, BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | 330 hp 246 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW7 Series (E65)Facelift 2005745d | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 330 hp 246 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 978 km 608 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 7 Series (E65) Facelift 2005 745d
- Has 280 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 400 kg lighter
- Has 46 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























