BMW 7 Series (E38) · Facelift 1998
Car comparison
BMW 7 Series (E38) · Facelift 1998 750ivsHolden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHolden Commodore (VT)
5.7 i V8 SS
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 750i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful326 hp243 kW
- Highest torque490 Nm361 lb-ft
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score70/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best power-to-weight187 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326hp243kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 490Nm361lb-ft | 460Nm339lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 2,495kg5,501lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 60.0s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.2s Calculated | 24.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 699km434mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,379cc328cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,984mm196in | 4,964mm195in |
| Width | 1,862mm73in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,930mm115in | 2,788mm110in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,587mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 475L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 95L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 750i: Power / Torque
- Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 5,000 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 5,200 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.2 s | 24.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 326 hp 243 kW |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 306 hp 228 kW |
BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 750i has 20 hp more than Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS.
The biggest power difference is between Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS and BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 750i: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 1,960 kg 4,321 lb |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 6.6 s |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 750i and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 326 hp 243 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp 243 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,960 kg 4,321 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.6 L/100 km 17.3 mpg US 20.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 699 km 434 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 750i |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.30 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,040 L539 US gal449 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,570 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 750i
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Is 320 kg lighter
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























