Maserati Coupe
Car comparison
Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32VvsBMW 6 Series (E63) 650i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 6 Series (E63)
650i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i
- Highest torque490 Nm361 lb-ft
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.6 L/100 km13.4 mpg US16.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range588 km366 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph
- Most powerful390 hp291 kW
- Best power-to-weight234 hp/t174 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | BMW6 Series (E63)650i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 390hp291kW | 367hp274kW |
| Torque | 451Nm333lb-ft | 490Nm361lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 71.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.7s Calculated | 18.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK | 17.6L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 224hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 553km344mi Calculated | 588km366mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,244cc259cu in | 4,799cc293cu in |
| Length | 4,523mm178in | 4,820mm190in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,855mm73in |
| Height | 1,305mm51in | 1,373mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,558mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,538mm61in | 1,596mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 315L | 450L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 6,300 rpm | 3,400 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | BMW6 Series (E63)650i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.7 s | 18.6 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 367 hp 274 kW |
Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V has 23 hp more than BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i and Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 4.9 s |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V and BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i and Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V: 4.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 553 km 344 mi |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 588 km 366 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW | 4.9 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 367 hp 274 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V |
| 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
| BMW6 Series (E63)650i | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | BMW6 Series (E63)650i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 390 hp 291 kW | 367 hp 274 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 553 km 344 mi | 588 km 366 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.83 LC100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.78 LC100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,385 L630 US gal525 UK gal | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,174 LC/year | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V
- Has 23 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW 6 Series (E63) 650i
- Has 39 Nm more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Uses 4.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 35 km (22 mi) more estimated range
- Has 135 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























