BMW 6 Series (E63)
Car comparison
BMW 6 Series (E63) 645CivsChrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChrysler Crossfire
SRT-6 3.2i V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 6 Series (E63) 645Ci
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful333 hp248 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions264 g/km
- Best estimated range642 km399 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333hp248kW | 330hp246kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,695kg3,737lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | 2,065kg4,553lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 63.4s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.3s Calculated | 18.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 196hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 642km399mi Calculated | 545km339mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,398cc268cu in | 3,199cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,820mm190in | 4,058mm160in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,766mm70in |
| Height | 1,373mm54in | 1,296mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,558mm61in | 1,493mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,592mm63in | 1,502mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 215L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 264g/km | 264g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 6 Series (E63) 645Ci: Power / Torque
- Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 6,100 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 6,100 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.3 s | 18.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 333 hp 248 kW |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 330 hp 246 kW |
BMW 6 Series (E63) 645Ci has 3 hp more than Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6.
The biggest power difference is between Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6 and BMW 6 Series (E63) 645Ci: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 5.8 s |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 5.3 s |
Although BMW 6 Series (E63) 645Ci has more power, Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6 and BMW 6 Series (E63) 645Ci: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 196 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 642 km 399 mi |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 545 km 339 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 333 hp 248 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 6 Series (E63) 645Ci is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | 196 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW6 Series (E63)645Ci | ChryslerCrossfireSRT-6 3.2i V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp 248 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 642 km 399 mi | 545 km 339 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 264 g/km | 264 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 196 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 6 Series (E63) 645Ci | Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 6 Series (E63) 645Ci
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 97 km (60 mi) more estimated range
- Has 235 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6 3.2i V6
- Is 240 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























