BMW 6 Series (E24) · Facelift 1982
Car comparison
BMW 6 Series (E24) · Facelift 1982 M 635CSivsBMW 6 Series (E24) 635CSi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 6 Series (E24)
635CSi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Best power-to-weight191 hp/t142 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score60/100
BMW 6 Series (E24) 635CSi
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range700 km435 mi
- Largest trunk415 L
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,500kg3,307lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.5s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 94.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.5s Calculated | 40.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 191hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 619km385mi Calculated | 700km435mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,453cc211cu in | 3,453cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,755mm187in | 4,755mm187in |
| Width | 1,725mm68in | 1,725mm68in |
| Height | 1,355mm53in | 1,365mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,626mm103in |
| Front track | 1,430mm56in | 1,422mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,464mm58in | 1,487mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 415L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi: Power / Torque
- BMW 6 Series (E24) 635CSi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.5 s | 40.5 s |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 286 hp 213 kW |
| BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi | 218 hp 163 kW |
BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi has 68 hp more than BMW 6 Series (E24) 635CSi.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 6 Series (E24) 635CSi and BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi: 68 hp (51 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 6.4 s |
| BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi and BMW 6 Series (E24) 635CSi: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 6 Series (E24) 635CSi and BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 619 km 385 mi |
| BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi | 700 km 435 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.4 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi | 218 hp 163 kW | 7.6 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW6 Series (E24)Facelift 1982M 635CSi | BMW6 Series (E24)635CSi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 619 km 385 mi | 700 km 435 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 415 L 14.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi | BMW 6 Series (E24) 635CSi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 6 Series (E24) Facelift 1982 M 635CSi
- Has 68 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 33 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW 6 Series (E24) 635CSi
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 81 km (50 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























