Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIvsBMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 5 Series Touring (G61)
520i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,696 kg3,739 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t84 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk660 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score90/100
BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520i
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,696kg3,739lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Gross weight | 2,168kg4,780lb | 2,435kg5,368lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 72.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.6s Calculated | 34.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 825km513mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 5,060mm199in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,477mm58in | 1,515mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,995mm118in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,634mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,668mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | 155mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 660L | 570L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,950L | 1,700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 4,400-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.6 s | 34.3 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 1,696 kg 3,739 lb |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 7.8 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520i and Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 825 km 513 mi |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 882 km 548 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI | BMW5 Series Touring (G61)520i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,696 kg 3,739 lb | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 825 km 513 mi | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI | BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 79 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW 5 Series Touring (G61) 520i
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 57 km (36 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























