BMW 5 Series Touring (G31)
Car comparison
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525dvsSkoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Superb III Combi
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,294 km804 mi
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score93/100
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,475 kg3,252 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk660 L
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,705kg3,759lb | 1,475kg3,252lb |
| Gross weight | 2,425kg5,346lb | 2,130kg4,696lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 72.1s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.9s Calculated | 25.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,294km804mi Calculated | 1,015km631mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,942mm195in | 4,856mm191in |
| Width | 1,868mm74in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,498mm59in | 1,477mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,975mm117in | 2,841mm112in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,630mm64in | 1,574mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | 149mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 660L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,700L | 1,950L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d: Power / Torque
- Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 4,400 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.9 s | 25.3 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 231 hp 172 kW |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d has 11 hp more than Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI and BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 243 km/h 151 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 6.8 s |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d and Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d and Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 1,294 km 804 mi |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 1,015 km 631 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.8 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.1 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,294 km 804 mi | 1,015 km 631 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d | Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 279 km (173 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI
- Is 230 kg lighter
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























