BMW 5 Series Touring (G31)
Car comparison
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520dvsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions124 g/km
- Best estimated range1,404 km873 mi
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 2,390kg5,269lb | 2,085kg4,597lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 68.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.8s Calculated | 32.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,404km873mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,942mm195in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,868mm74in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,498mm59in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,975mm117in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,630mm64in | 1,561mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,700L | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 124g/km | 127g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.8 s | 32.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 7.8 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 1,404 km 873 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,404 km 873 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 124 g/km | 127 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 404 km (251 mi) more estimated range
- Has 210 L more trunk volume
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























