Volvo S60
Car comparison
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20VvsBMW 5 Series (E39) · Facelift 2000 540i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 5 Series (E39) · Facelift 2000
540i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score78/100
BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 540i V8
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lightest1,585 kg3,494 lb
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,614kg3,558lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 60.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.1s Calculated | 18.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 17.7L/100 km13.3mpg US16.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 180hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 636km395mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 4,398cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,606mm181in | 4,775mm188in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,431mm56in | 1,435mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,830mm111in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,512mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,526mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 424L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,034L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V: Power / Torque
- BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 540i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 5,500 rpm | 1,950-5,250 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 5,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.1 s | 18.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 300 hp 224 kW |
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 286 hp 213 kW |
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V has 14 hp more than BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 540i V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 540i V8 and Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb |
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 5.7 s |
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V and BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 540i V8: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 180 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60R 2.5i 20V | BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,614 kg 3,558 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 636 km 395 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 424 L 15.0 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 180 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,809 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 R 2.5i 20V
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 540i V8
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 29 kg lighter
- Has 36 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























