BMW 5 Series (E39) · Facelift 2000
Car comparison
BMW 5 Series (E39) · Facelift 2000 540ivsHolden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHolden Commodore (VT)
5.7 i V8 SS
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque460 Nm339 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight187 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best practicality score75/100
BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 540i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 460Nm339lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 60.0s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.4s Calculated | 24.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.9L/100 km11.8mpg US14.2mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 177hp/t132kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 583km362mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,398cc268cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,775mm188in | 4,964mm195in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,435mm56in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,830mm111in | 2,788mm110in |
| Front track | 1,512mm60in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,587mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 475L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 540i: Power / Torque
- Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i | 5,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 5,200 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.4 s | 24.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i | 286 hp 213 kW |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 306 hp 228 kW |
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS has 20 hp more than BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 540i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 540i and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i | 6.5 s |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 6.9 s |
Although Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS has more power, BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 540i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 540i and Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.9 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000540i | HoldenCommodore (VT)5.7 i V8 SS | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 583 km 362 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 177 hp/t 132 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 540i |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 540i
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Holden Commodore (VT) 5.7 i V8 SS
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























