BMW 5 Series (E39) · Facelift 2000
Car comparison
BMW 5 Series (E39) · Facelift 2000 535i V8vsHolden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHolden Calais (VT)
3.8i V6 SC
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 535i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score75/100
Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC
- Highest torque375 Nm277 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 233hp174kW |
| Torque | 345Nm254lb-ft | 375Nm277lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 69.6s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.3s Calculated | 31.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.5L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 593km369mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 3,791cc231cu in |
| Length | 4,775mm188in | 4,964mm195in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,435mm56in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,830mm111in | 2,788mm110in |
| Front track | 1,512mm60in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,587mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 475L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 535i V8: Power / Torque
- Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | 5,800 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 5,200 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.3 s | 31.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | 245 hp 183 kW |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 233 hp 174 kW |
BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 535i V8 has 12 hp more than Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC.
The biggest power difference is between Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC and BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 535i V8: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | 345 Nm 254 lb-ft |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | 6.9 s |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 535i V8 and Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | 233 hp 174 kW | 7.9 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW5 Series (E39)Facelift 2000535i V8 | HoldenCalais (VT)3.8i V6 SC | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 233 hp 174 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 345 Nm 254 lb-ft | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 593 km 369 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 535i V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 5 Series (E39) Facelift 2000 535i V8
- Has 12 hp more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 34 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Holden Calais (VT) 3.8i V6 SC
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























