Porsche Cayman (981C)
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7vsBMW 4 Series Gran Coupe (F36) 430d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)
430d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 4 Series Gran Coupe (F36) 430d
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions138 g/km
- Best estimated range1,075 km668 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score68/100
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed264 km/h164 mph
- Most powerful275 hp205 kW
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight202 hp/t151 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 275hp205kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 290Nm214lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 2,165kg4,773lb |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.9s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph Calculated | 77.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.1s Calculated | 20.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 202hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 349Nm/t233lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 810km503mi Calculated | 1,075km668mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,706cc165cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,380mm172in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,294mm51in | 1,389mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | - | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 480L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,300L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 57L |
| CO2 emissions | 183g/km | 138g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: Power / Torque
- BMW 4 Series Gran Coupe (F36) 430d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7,400 rpm | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.1 s | 20.4 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 275 hp 205 kW |
| BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d | 258 hp 192 kW |
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 has 17 hp more than BMW 4 Series Gran Coupe (F36) 430d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 4 Series Gran Coupe (F36) 430d and Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft |
| BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 5.6 s |
| BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d | 5.6 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 4 Series Gran Coupe (F36) 430d and Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 810 km 503 mi |
| BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d | 1,075 km 668 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 275 hp 205 kW | 5.6 s | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d | 258 hp 192 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 4 Series Gran Coupe (F36) 430d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (981C)2.7 | BMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)430d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 275 hp 205 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 810 km 503 mi | 1,075 km 668 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 183 g/km | 138 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7 | BMW 4 Series Gran Coupe (F36) 430d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (981C) 2.7
- Has 17 hp more
- Is 245 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 41 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW 4 Series Gran Coupe (F36) 430d
- Has 270 Nm more
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 265 km (165 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
- Emits 45 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























